Christoph Bartoschek
2011-01-01 16:05:41 UTC
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705
Note that bug makes no mention of ATI or fglrx, and started out as anapparent Intel driver bug.
X.org bug because of the above bug report. Now I think again that it is
a fglrx problem because the radeon driver seems to not show the same
behaviour. Unfortunately the radeon drvier does not work at all. I see
only in the logfile that it wants to set the DPI to 108. But I get no
picture from it.
As they do not provide a config option for the old behaviour
You apparently didn't read the first comment in bug 32430 very well. Itindicates one _can_ configure X via configfile _almost_ as before, e.g.
to use whatever DisplaySize (and thus DPI) one wants: "placing screen
and display parameters that used to work in xorg.conf into
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ files produces expected results".
In 11.3, with open source drivers at least, you simply must set
DisplaySize via xorg.conf.d/ rather than xorg.conf. If you use your
display's actual size, you'll get an accurate DPI. You can also fudge
that size to your liking by lying it bigger or smaller, which because of
the way common scalable fonts behave can often produce more pleasing
fonts if you choose a DPI that is a multiple of 12. In your case of a
109 DPI display that would be 108 (slightly smaller fonts) or 120
(larger fonts). http://fm.no-ip.com/Share/DisplaySize contains many
sizes that, give or take rounding behavior that varies according to
drivers, will produce 12 multiples.
and also in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-monitor.conf. I see no difference
with the fglrx driver. Even after deleting /etc/X11/xorg.conf
However the fglrx driver responds to the -dpi option. Is there a way to
get it added to the startup of the X server if one uses kdm4?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+***@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+***@opensuse.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+***@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+***@opensuse.org